Risk Library
   Documents by Author
     Committees at the Bank for International...
       Disclosure Framework For Securities Sett...
         
         VI. Default procedures
         










 

Disclosure Framework For Securities Settlement Systems

VI. Default procedures

Events of default are among the most difficult and stressful occurrences that market participants and SSSs may experience. The IOSCO Report underscores the need for transparency in the area of default procedures on the grounds that it will provide more certainty in the operation of critical market mechanisms during these stressful events, and thereby reduce the risk that a single default will cause further disruptions.

Because the definition of a default event may differ across systems, the IOSCO Report recommends disclosure with regard to the circumstances in which action may be taken, as well as who may take it, and the scope of the actions that may be taken. In some cases, the term "default" may not be used by the SSS in its rules and procedures or in contracts with its participants. In these instances, SSSs should attempt to spell out for their participants both how they would address the insolvency of a participant and any other circumstances in which they would initiate exceptional measures to fulfil settlement or other obligations to their participants.

In this regard, this section attempts to lay out in one place the available resources of the SSS with respect to meeting obligations in the event of a default or other events that would trigger exceptional measures. It is important for participants to understand what these resources are as well as the order in which they will be accessed. The questions also address the possibility that securities or funds transfers will be unwound by the SSS. Because unwinds are a way to reallocate liquidity pressures and credit losses, it is vital that participants understand all the possible circumstances in which an unwind could occur.

A. Please discuss the events or circumstances that would constitute default of a participant under the rules and procedures of the SSS or that would lead the SSS to make use of exceptional settlement arrangements or unwind procedures.

  1. Failure by a participant to meet a test of its solvency under the applicable laws of its jurisdiction?
  2. Failure to make payments or deliveries of securities within the time specified?
  3. To the extent that the rules and procedures grant discretion in the determination of the use of default or other exceptional procedures, please discuss where the authority to exercise such discretion resides and the circumstances in which this authority would be used.

B. What procedures are followed by the SSS once it has determined that a default event has occurred or that exceptional settlement arrangements are to be employed?

  1. How and at what point are participants notified that this has occurred?
  2. Would the SSS be expected to continue to meet all its obligations to participants under these circumstances? Please discuss the resources in place to ensure that this would occur (e.g. collateral, participants' fund, insurance, loss-sharing arrangements, etc.).
  3. Please describe and provide a time line indicating the order in which these resources would be used as well as the timing of participant notifications and important deadlines (e.g. when the SSS's obligations to participants would be met, when participants would need to cover their loss-sharing obligations).
  4. Please describe all conditions under which provisional transfers of securities or funds could be unwound by the SSS.

    1. How and on what authority would a decision to unwind securities or funds transfers be made by the SSS?
    2. When and how would participants be notified of a decision to unwind provisional securities or funds transfers?
    3. How long would participants have to cover any debit positions in their own securities or funds accounts resulting from an unwind?
    4. In the event of an unwind, would all transfers be unwound or would only a subset of transfers (e.g. only securities purchases or only those of a subset of participants) be unwound?
    5. If only a subset of transfers, what procedure would be followed to determine which transfers and in what order?
  5. Can bankruptcy or insolvency be declared retrospectively in the SSS's jurisdiction (e.g. under a "zero-hour" rule), and could this cause provisional securities or funds transfers to be unwound?
  6. Please describe any circumstances in which transfers of securities or funds that were defined as final in response to question V.E.2 above would ever be unwound.

C. Has a participant in the SSS ever been declared in default or become insolvent?

  1. Have loss-sharing procedures been invoked?
  2. Please describe whether any of these defaults or insolvencies resulted in losses for the SSS or its participants and how they were absorbed.

Contact us * Risk Library * Documents by Author * Committees at the Bank for International Settlement (BIS) * Disclosure Framework For Securities Settlement Systems